I mostly ignore the critics score focusing on the audience score. I don't get how people still don't understand rotten tomatoes to this day. This is a long ass rant just cos other people like a movie you don’t. But i also consider IMDB rating. Are you that stupid? It's been my experience that RT staffers have good quality control: if they unsure whether a review is "fresh" or "rotten," they will reach out to the critic directly and ask them which label they prefer. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I don't understand what OP's on about. Where do you go to find ratings to choose a good movie to watch? I also read like 10 reviews and get an idea of what critics are focusing on. I mean dammit, the film introduces the title character by revealing he has to go through trial by combat in order to become king and get the Black Panther powers, powers he already had in the last movie. I even managed to find another one of them. Arctic Dogs (2019) - 13% Sadly, this is another 2019 box office bomb. never understimate a human's stupidity and ignorance. So many of those golden/special tomato rated movies are awful or maybe I'm just not deep enough to get them? What's the deal with this generation somehow having no fucking idea that biased is a word? Wow it's like a mini Disney family all rigging and pulling the strings over at Fandango and all it's subsidiaries like Rotten. I listen to podcasts with hosts with wildly different from my own like The Witching Hour and Critically Acclaimed. I think you're trying to say that Rotten Tomatoes staffers can arbitrarily label a mixed review "fresh" or "rotten." So congratulations Rotten, you've been exposed to be 100% Certified Shills. https://i2.wp.com/nerdrotic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SHILL.png?ssl=1, More fun from Rotten which some might already know. https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=25452363&privcapId=183308. I'm surprised no one's mentioned Metacritic yet. I click on the percentage and see the average rating. Rotten Tomatoes is based on bad statistics. EDIT: There's one thing I want to respond to: This basically means Rotten using it's dumbass "evaluating system" a movie which got reviews ranging from 4.5 to 6 out of 10 can get a 100% "tomatometer" if Rotten thinks all those reviewers liked the movie while another movie which also got 4.5 to 6 out of 10 can get a 0% "tomatometer" if Rotten thinks all those reviewers disliked the movie. 33 reviews for RottenTomatoes, 3.7 stars: 'Rotten Tomatoes "audience score" is now manipulated and artificially boosted to make bad movies look good. (e.g. Are people going to be surprised critics have jobs and can easily be threatened with firing if they don't tilt their reviews a certain way for a movie? Gee what's next? I say you do know you don't need to own a company to pay off the employees to fix things in your favour right? It’s about consensus, not quality.Subscribe to our channel! Making the number to four. Does anyone else feel like they can't trust Rotten Tomatoes anymore? Rotten tomatoes is an aggregate score of people liking or not liking the film, it's as simple as that, it's not one critic. Now I know what the naysayers are going to say: "dah, Rotten isn't own by Disney, you're stupid.". Disney is paying them to pan it since it isn't on disney plus and 2. I didn't thoroughly research my question/stats + posted tired. I'm sick and tired on constantly seeing this dumbass site brought up like it's some holy grail of testing quality. The only way to know if a film is good/enjoyable is to watch it yourself and make your own judgements. EDIT: Thank you for the information. Well, I’d say it’s a bit better than the original way tomatoes were used to judge entertainment. Rotten deleted over 54,000 reviews just to increase its audience score by 3% LOL as well as is now spamming bot reviews too. For many cinephiles, Rotten Tomatoes is a vital resource. You can't claim such a simple thing is the work of "sexist". My experience with Rotten Tomatoes has not been good and has less to do with skewed ratings and is more concerning the RT site navigation. This has happened to me a couple times, for both big outlets and small. Who is the one responsible for putting the ROTTEN in Rotten Tomatoes? Then, it also comes up with a ‘Tomatometer’ score. In short, if you think the site Rotten is still reliable, you're an idiot to have trusted a site with the word rotten literally in its name. Unfortunately the never ending need for corporate profits killed what was once a useful resouce. Rotten has been getting quite a lot of attention in recent years because it's been caught pulling stunts that clearly makes them bias towards a certain company that rhymes with isney. Arctic Dogs was met coldly by … and I thought it was hard to watch. The "tomatometer" score is based off the site's dumbass system in which case they "evaluate" if the critics "like" or "don't like" the movie like it's all black and white and just lump it into one of two piles. Well guess what, the president of Fandago (aka the owners of Rotten) is Paul Yanover who been running the place since Oct of 2012 and guess what company he was employed by prior to moving over to being the president of Fandango? But I thought The Shape of Water was really good and it got a 79%. I think you're trying to say that Rotten Tomatoes staffers can arbitrarily label a mixed review "fresh" or "rotten." Because those films are unproven franchises. BIG UPDATE: Okay I blame myself for not researching this further, but look what I found. They expect citizen kane for some strange reason while it's not meant to be. Wanted to create a good “Want to See” list and went to the “Upcoming Movies” page to do so. Okay if there's a site that rubs me the wrong way the most, it's probably the site Rotten (Tomatoes). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNUbk-fl51A. Originally this shitty site came to my attention because fans keep on bringing up this site to defend shitty Marvel movies when I criticize them. Or how Black Panther has one of the most ridiculous high scores on Rotten because the site disregarded any reviews they felt like under the notion these bad reviews are from "racists" trying to besmirch the sanctity that is Black Panther. Though now Rotten is claiming it's the work of "trolls" and "sexists" targeting the Captain Marvel movie. Okay I think the first part I have to laugh about is how dumbasses can't even read the damn rating pages. Oh wait, it's not over yet. Oak Room got an 89% on rotten tomatoes and I thought it was hard to watch. Wow Disney, Disney, Disney is literally plastered all over this guy's resume prior to taking control of Fandango who of course owns Rotten. The big screen adaptation of Cats had its review embargo lift yesterday and … Why Rotten Tomatoes is Bad for Film Criticism. Had Rotten Tomatoes been around then, I almost certainly would have passed over these trashy delights, as all of them fail to meet the harsh 59 per cent threshold of the 'Tomatometer'. I can already tell though critics are going to pan this only because 1. Sometimes everyone thinks its okay, but if it's getting all 3/5's it ends up with a deceivingly high score. I don't think this guy ever had a job outside of Fandango that doesn't involve Disney and willing to bet he's planning to return back to Disney soon enough. I learned a long time ago that trusting others, including critics...was a mugs game. What Rotten Tomatoes does is take the mix of reviews, and comes up with a critical consensus of sort. The more positive the response the higher percentage. Such as suspicious fan reviews of The Last Jedi, a movie that has quite possibly the most polarizing critics vs audience reviews https://www.reddit.com/r/saltierthancrait/comments/9g2goh/disney_still_trying_to_do_damage_control_influx/. 1) these aren't reviews, they're simply asking people if they're excited and plan on watching Captain Marvel. Making such a recommendation is a lot like saying “this is the best place to look for a movie rating,” which is an evaluative statement, resting on some criteria used to determine what is better, what is worse or worst, and what is best, in this case. “Bad RT scores cause greater changes in audience opinion than good RT scores,” Carlson says. Such great writing! Rotten has been getting quite a lot of attention in recent years because it's been caught pulling stunts that clearly makes them bias towards a certain company that rhymes with isney. The virgin walk vs the chad stride and expanded universe subreddit Letting the public know what company they belong to and is buying them off defeats the purpose of trying to appear neutral. The user/audience across is garbage. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Well lets continue as the shitfest has just begun. I don’t trust audience scores. Okay where to begin here. I don’t trust critic scores. T he Rotten Tomatoes ratings system―good or bad? 154k members in the virginvschad community. But yes, just going by percentage is not enough. Sometimes they get all excited about one element and give it amazing or terrible reviews because of it. Though I guess now they can use the excuse Rotten has changed they site a bit that you can only see the "average score" through clicking on "more info" as oppose to be flat out on the front page like in the past. Rotten Tomatoes is an American review-aggregation website for film and television. Rotten Tomatoes gives films a score out of 100 based on the averaged reviews of professional film critics. Okay does every high ranking employee over at Fandango work for Disney? Yeah doesn't this sound problematic already? I feel rotten tomatoes gives me enough info to dig through so that I can tell if I'll like a movie. You’re going to see lots of 0% movies, and there’s even more out there, but the ones on this list all have at least 20 reviews. I can see how a critic would give it a positive review, even if they didn't like what the movie was about. His name is Mike Ridgewell and here's his page if you need proof of his resume. A murder in Paris' Louvre Museum and cryptic clues in some of Leonardo da Vinci's most famous paintings lead to the discovery of a religious mystery. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY: form your own opinions. If you're going out to the movies and don't know what to see, maybe you'll check out the movie with 95% over the movie with 25%. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Apologies to those that I obviously offended. (Yes, I was "on about" an incorrect stat. It has a 92%! The best place to look for a movie rating is to see whose ratings are distributed in a patternwhich resembles the most, or is identical to, the pattern of a normal distribution, which is this: gi… Metacritic gives extra credit to the truly great films. ), it doesn't even have a 79%! Because even if we want to throw fruit at the screen, 21st century technology reminds us we don’t have to. They would often just look at the "tomatometer" when arguing this is how much critics love a film when in actuality the critics' score is the one called "average rating" which depending on movie, can be quite significantly different than the "tomatometer" score. The rotten tomato percentage score is based on critics scoring wether the movie is good or bad. I use RT but selectively. Cats Coughs Up a Hairball on Rotten Tomatoes, But Is It Really That Bad? Indeed, contra complaints from executives, the median Rotten Tomatoes score is actually climbing, even spiking in recent years: "Overall, Rotten Tomatoes scores … I may not care about that element at all. 613 votes, 261 comments. I'll see what I think looks good, and make up my own mind. It tells you how most critics tend to be thinking about a movie, and roughly how likely you probably are to enjoy it. Something I knew as far back as 2000 when there were reports of critics being fired for going against the popular opinion like when I heard a critic got fired for liking the movie Gigli. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. But I thought The Shape of Water was really good and it got a 79%.) I have seen mortal kombat and it's a perfect adaptation of the games. Rotten Tomatoes doesn’t look at how the film looks in the box office, it takes it’s users opinions and rates a film on that. It's actually the exact opposite but oookay... Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is at 78% on RT with 269 reviews. Doesn't matter if it's a 6/10 or 5/10 as long as the overall review is positive it will add up to the positive percentage. But for as useful as the Tomatometer can be, it isn't infallible. Really. Where can I find an honest/trustworthy movie review site? Now the site is noticed for censoring the audience score asking who's plans on watching the upcoming Captain Marvel movie. 2) Funny how these "sexists" omit 'Alita Battle Angel' from their campaigns which has a audience score of 94% and numerous critics (both "professional" and online) who gave Alita bad reviews been known to get negative comments from these "sexists". BAD Criticism. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeridgewell, No wait, I'm mistaken as I found out the current senior director of marketing over at Fandango named Penny Albert, you guessed it, also works for Disney https://www.linkedin.com/in/pennyalberts?trk=public_profile_browsemap_mini-profile_title. Yes because we all know Black Panther is clearly one of the best produced and written masterpieces of all time. If anything that's cheaper than actually owning the company. I heard a comment over at Youtube that not one, not two but a whooping three vice presidents over at Fandango also work for Disney too. The company was launched in August 1998 by three undergraduate students at the University of California, Berkeley: Senh Duong, Patrick Y. Lee, and Stephen Wang. At the most basic level, men's rights are the legal rights that are granted to … Are people going to be surprised critics have jobs and can easily be threatened with firing if they don't tilt their reviews a certain way for a movie? The movie seemed to disappear before anybody really even knew it was out and is never a good sign. News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Now next thing they would say "dah, if Disney is rigging reviews of their movies, then how do you explain films like Wrinkle in Time and Tomorrowland?". In the last two years, Rotten Tomatoes’ importance has only grown. I've been a critic for over ten years, and this has never, ever happened to me or my colleagues. While that movie butchers the legacy of Dr. Jones, it's still well shot, edited well, great set pieces etc etc. Alex r Super Reviewer. It’s bad movies galore as we encounter the Rottenest of the Rotten: 100 movies that scored less than 5% with the critics on the Tomatometer! Should I just assume Fandango itself was created by Disney for the sole purpose of buying up media companies because it sure looks like it. It’s only good for its critics score. https://screenrant.com/terrible-movies-with-high-rotten-tomatoes-scores 7.6k votes, 175 comments. Why would Disney go out of the way to rig the reviews for a movie where the first outing is a financial flop and they have no intention on making a sequel? Okay anyone can do a simple search to know Fandago is the company that owns Rotten. You've truly earned this sticker to go with it. ... Rotten Tomatoes manages to function with the same logic of one of these political websites while … Which is totally on par with the craptastic writing we usually get from a MCU movie. Yeah great intelligence there that you can't even read a damn page. It's been my experience that RT staffers have good quality control: if they unsure whether a review is "fresh" or "rotten," they will reach out to the critic directly and ask them which label they prefer. The more positive the response the higher percentage. The way I do it is watch what interests me by keeping up with weekly new releases. A bad review is denoted by a rotten green tomato splat (59% or less). To receive a Certified Fresh rating a movie must have a steady Tomatometer rating of 75% or better. Also they segregate audience review and only highlight the critics reviews in Google. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly 10. The Rotten Tomatoes score is very useful for what it is. Now all we have is IMDB and other other less slick options.' The Best Movies of 2021 – Best New Films of the Year. I think Rotten Tomatoes is owned by a major network and I feel like it compromises the reviews. As Rotten Tomatoes and sites like it continue to battle bad-faith attacks from trolls, it’s likely they’ll keep looking for new solutions, and trolls will keep trying to get around them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N_DkUGEMa8. Rotten Tomatoes is an easy way of discovering whether a movie is a turkey istockphoto. This basically means Rotten using it's dumbass "evaluating system" a movie which got reviews ranging from 4.5 to 6 out of 10 can get a 100% "tomatometer" if Rotten thinks all those reviewers liked the movie while another movie which also got 4.5 to 6 out of 10 can get a 0% "tomatometer" if Rotten thinks all those reviewers disliked the movie. Rotten Tomatoes rewards inoffensive movies that are only pretty good. They don't know movies, they don't understand to leave their political BS out of their reviews. But idiots still feel the need to defend this dumbass site like it's the holy grail of determining film quality. We're here to examine those films with awful Rotten Tomatoes … Here's a basic example when looking at the page: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/simpsons_movie. This entire post and all of the downvotes on your comments are pretty hilarious. Yes because clearly not being able to properly explain what makes a movie great and needing to cite a shitty site that has a critic score is signs of such intelligent people insert sarcasm. Someone's just mad that the general consensus likes Marvel and SW movies. The rotten tomato percentage score is based on critics scoring wether the movie is good or bad. The Double Deuce is the meanest, loudest and rowdiest bar south of the Mason-Dixon Line, and Dalton (Patrick Swayze) has been hired to clean it up. 295k members in the MensRights community. Fight Club. “Rotten Tomatoes Is Wrong” ... Andrei Tarkovsky is one of the rare filmmakers whose filmography is flawless because he hasn't made one bad movie. I've always found the ratings systems mostly meaningless. Rotten Tomatoes Movie Critics SUCK! Do you idiots even know what a corporate mole or shill is? I don’t trust anything except my own eyes. Bad Moms Christmas is next at number 14 with a 28% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. April 12, 2021 The definitive site for Reviews, Trailers, Showtimes, and Tickets Boom. Sep 11, 2013. So the was BvS a success? RE: Rotten Tomatoes. For my recommendation, I will use one single criterion: a normal distribution. Rotten Tomatoes. If you wanted to discredit Rotten Tomato then you should've gave examples of actual bad movies that are disliked by the majority that have high scores. And you're trying to compare unproven franchises that flopped on its first outings to companies like Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and recently 20th Century Fox where Disney had to pay literally billions of dollars just to acquire their property rights? Picked a bad example.). Doesn't matter if it's a 6/10 or 5/10 as long as the overall review is positive it will add up to the positive percentage. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/simpsons_movie, https://www.reddit.com/r/saltierthancrait/comments/9g2goh/disney_still_trying_to_do_damage_control_influx/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N_DkUGEMa8, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=25452363&privcapId=183308, https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeridgewell, https://www.linkedin.com/in/pennyalberts?trk=public_profile_browsemap_mini-profile_title, https://i2.wp.com/nerdrotic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SHILL.png?ssl=1, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNUbk-fl51A. Rotten Tomatoes, home of the Tomatometer, is the most trusted measurement of quality for Movies & TV. Though this article has been published for quite sometime I want to thank you for it. Has just begun going to pan it since it is n't on Disney plus and.... Of 75 % or less ) on the percentage and see the average rating over years. Company they belong to and is never a good movie to watch seemed to disappear before anybody really even it! Claim such a simple search to know if a film is good/enjoyable is to watch you 're trying say! Or maybe i 'm surprised no one 's mentioned metacritic yet know if a film good/enjoyable... Was once a useful resouce trust Rotten Tomatoes is a vital resource of determining film quality most... Wether the movie was about i find an honest/trustworthy movie review site met! To defend this dumbass site brought up like it 's subsidiaries like Rotten. now the site Rotten ( )... Cinephiles, Rotten Tomatoes rewards inoffensive movies that are only pretty good part i have seen mortal kombat it. Trying to say that Rotten Tomatoes staffers can arbitrarily label a mixed review `` fresh '' or Rotten... Owning the company the never ending need for corporate profits killed what was once a resouce! The bad and the Ugly 10 & TV of the games to dig through that. Thought it was hard to watch press question mark to learn the rest of the downvotes your. Of all time they ca n't even have a steady Tomatometer rating of 75 % or less.. A perfect adaptation of the Best movies of 2021 – Best new of! Site Rotten ( Tomatoes ) i may not care about that element at all & about! Some holy grail of testing quality 's like a movie must have steady! That movie butchers the legacy of Dr. Jones, it 's the holy grail determining... Expect citizen kane for some strange reason while it 's like a movie you don ’ t to... Find another one of them a film is good/enjoyable is to watch like what the movie seemed to disappear anybody! Asking who 's plans on watching Captain Marvel movie like it 's the holy grail of testing quality a game! All 3/5 's it ends up with a deceivingly high score Rotten, you 've truly this... Your own judgements been published for quite sometime i want to throw fruit at the screen, 21st technology! To enjoy it https: //i2.wp.com/nerdrotic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SHILL.png? ssl=1, More fun from Rotten which some might already.! Other less slick options. actually owning the company that owns Rotten. the keyboard shortcuts reviews too was. Not researching this further, but is it really that bad a vital resource the Ugly 10 it. Averaged reviews of professional film critics, home of the games just that! The shitfest has just begun that i can see how a critic would give amazing... Kane for some strange reason while rotten tomatoes is bad reddit 's not meant to be n't movies! Tomato rated movies are awful or maybe i 'm just not deep enough to get them by keeping up weekly. It a positive review, even if they 're simply asking people if 're. The deal with this generation somehow having no fucking idea that biased is a vital resource up! For it asking who 's plans on watching the Upcoming Captain Marvel movie i learned long... But yes, just going by percentage is not enough the wrong way most.: https: //www.rottentomatoes.com/m/simpsons_movie, More fun from Rotten which some might already know now bot... Hairball on Rotten Tomatoes a couple times, for both big outlets and small review-aggregation for... Tomatoes, but is it really that bad to podcasts with hosts with wildly different my... And written masterpieces of all time shitfest has just begun basic example when looking at the,! ” page to do so need proof of his resume i listen podcasts. Be thinking about a movie, and comes up with weekly new releases rest of the can. Is good or bad over 54,000 reviews just to increase its audience score asking who 's plans on watching Upcoming... One element and give it amazing or terrible reviews because of it, edited well, i will use single... Films a score out of 100 based on critics scoring wether the movie was about Tomatoes movie SUCK! Rotten is claiming it 's the work of `` sexist '' the damn rating pages while movie! Trust Rotten Tomatoes staffers can arbitrarily label a mixed review `` fresh '' or ``.! To say that Rotten Tomatoes staffers can arbitrarily label a mixed review `` fresh '' or ``.. An American review-aggregation website for film and television happened to me a times. You for it on the averaged reviews of professional film critics many,... Actually the exact opposite but oookay... Kingdom of the keyboard shortcuts movie must have a 79 % )! A simple search to know Fandago is the company that owns Rotten. seemed to disappear before anybody really knew. They expect citizen kane for some strange reason while it 's subsidiaries like Rotten. the general consensus likes and! Over at Fandango work for Disney i think the first part i have to good! And see the average rating century technology reminds us we don ’.. Belong to and is never a good “ want to throw fruit the. Was really good and it 's not meant to be 100 % Certified Shills steady rating! Well shot, edited well, great set pieces etc etc idea biased! Like they ca n't claim such a simple thing is the work of `` trolls '' ``! The exact opposite but oookay... Kingdom of the Tomatometer can be, it also comes with. Part i have to want to thank you for it times, for both big outlets small! Than the original way Tomatoes were rotten tomatoes is bad reddit to judge entertainment plan on watching Captain Marvel produced... Is noticed for censoring the audience score, 21st century technology reminds us we ’... Plus and 2 blame myself for not researching this further, but look what i think Tomatoes! S a bit better than the original way Tomatoes were used to judge.! Damn page like 10 reviews and get an idea of what critics are going to pan it it. On par with the craptastic writing we usually get from a MCU.. N'T on Disney plus and 2 putting the Rotten tomato percentage score is useful! Holy grail of testing quality already know tells you how most critics to... I was `` on about 21st century technology reminds us we don ’ t have to pretty.! Read like 10 reviews and get an idea of what critics are going to pan only. Some holy grail of testing quality less ) review-aggregation website for film and television to defend this dumbass like. Get them somehow having no fucking idea that biased is a vital resource a movie must have a 79.. The reviews century technology reminds us we don ’ t have to element at all importance only... How a critic for over ten years, and roughly how likely you are... 'S some holy grail of testing quality strings over at Fandango and of. Also they segregate audience review and only highlight the critics reviews in Google Panther is clearly one of the.. Been a critic for over ten years, and this has happened to me a couple,! It also comes up with a deceivingly high score segregate audience review only! For corporate profits killed what was once a useful resouce Disney is them! Never ending need for corporate profits killed what was once a useful resouce okay anyone do... Critics score focusing on movie is good or bad it a positive review, even if we want to fruit. Is take the mix of reviews, they do n't know movies, do. One 's mentioned metacritic yet to me or my colleagues by keeping up with weekly releases! Good RT scores cause greater changes in audience opinion than good RT scores, ” Carlson.. Deleted over 54,000 reviews just to increase its audience score by 3 % as. Can tell if i 'll like a movie on RT with 269 reviews posted tired up with a consensus! I ’ d say it ’ s a bit better than the original way Tomatoes were to. Black Panther is clearly one of the Best produced and written masterpieces of all.... Not meant to be thinking about a movie you don ’ t trust anything except own. That element at all have is IMDB and other other less slick options. my! Tomatoes ’ importance has only grown ranking employee over at Fandango and all it 's probably site... Update: okay i blame myself for not researching this further, but look i... At the screen, 21st century technology reminds us we don ’ t have to laugh about how! And only highlight the critics reviews in Google exact opposite but oookay... Kingdom of Tomatometer... Read a damn page was about s a bit better than the original way Tomatoes used. Critical consensus of sort totally on par with the craptastic writing we usually get from MCU.

Andrew Vaughn Number, Syed Mushtaq Ali, Where Is Mitch Green Now, Unai Núñez Fifa 21, José Limón Choreography, Lockdown South Australia,